Panthers dominant win against Storm even with controversial decisions

Penrith Panthers showcased their resilience with an impressive comeback to secure a commanding 34-16 victory over the Melbourne Storm. However, the NRL match was marred by a highly disputed try that ignited intense debates among players, commentators, and fans.

The Melbourne Storm initially surged ahead, building a 14-0 lead within the first 25 minutes through a try by Nelson Asofa-Solomona. Surprisingly, even the try-scorer himself appeared uncertain about the validity of his score. Doubts emerged due to two crucial factors: Asofa-Solomona’s potential double movement while being tackled by Dylan Edwards, and the possibility of the ball being dislodged by Sunia Turuva’s tackle from above.

During the Fox Sports commentary, skepticism regarding Asofa-Solomona’s control of the ball was voiced. Michael Ennis speculated that the try could be overturned, but when referee Adam Gee referred the decision to the bunker, official Gerard Sutton dismissed concerns of a double movement. Sutton instead claimed that Asofa-Solomona had regripped the ball before it made contact with the ground.

"Bit of luck going the way of Melbourne there."

Nelson Asofa-Solomona gets over but was this a try? 🤔

📺 Watch #NRLStormPanthers on ch.502 or stream on Kayo: https://t.co/B1ijnGY1g8
✍️ BLOG https://t.co/0UBEG1sXXu
🔢 MATCH CENTRE https://t.co/wsc9ghlwK2 pic.twitter.com/QZyiYN9Yse

— Fox League (@FOXNRL) June 30, 2023

The contentious ruling garnered mixed reactions. Commentator Ginnane expressed astonishment, while Ennis and Ginnane both contested the legitimacy of the try. This incident amplified perceptions of leniency within the Bunker, the video review system, during the 2023 season.

At halftime, Greg Alexander voiced his disagreement with the decision, noting Asofa-Solomona’s own indication that he had not scored. Alexander criticised the ruling, emphasising the moment when the ball appeared to come loose from Asofa-Solomona’s hands. Storm legend Cooper Cronk also expressed disbelief, asserting that it was a clear instance of a double movement and loss of control. Cronk voiced his dissatisfaction with the new rule, advocating for a stricter adherence to the principle that tries should resemble legitimate scoring actions.

The controversial decision sparked widespread outrage among fans, with social media platforms inundated with dissenting opinions. Many spectators highlighted what they perceived as a clear fumble by Asofa-Solomona, expressing frustration at the inconsistent application of the rules.

Remarkably, despite the controversial call, Penrith Panthers mounted a remarkable comeback before halftime, seizing a 16-14 lead. The Panthers demonstrated tremendous resilience and dominated the second half, scoring six tries as the NRL bookmaker outsiders . In contrast, the Storm struggled to make an impact, managing only a penalty goal early in the second half.

With this victory, the Penrith Panthers solidified their position at the top of the ladder. Meanwhile, the Storm will likely retain their place in the top four unless the Canberra Raiders achieve an unprecedented 153-point victory over the Titans—an improbable scenario.

While Penrith’s triumph showcased their strength and determination, the controversy surrounding the try and subsequent discussions will inevitably overshadow the match. Fans and pundits remain divided over the decision-making process and its implications for the game.

More sports news